El verbo haber
Estoy viendo el programa Master Chef 5, que os recomiendo, sobre todo a mis nuevos estudiantes que quieren ir a españa a abrir un Food Truck, que en realidad podríamos llamar GASTRONETA, como podéis ver en el enlace de la Fundeu, mi amiga.
Bueno, pues ya he hablado del Master Chef, de la gastroneta y de la Fundeu, pero en realidad quiero hablar del verbo HABER.
En este programa 13, en la presentación de los platos de la primera prueba, la participante Miri dice: "habían muchos ingredientes en el plato chef".
A mi se me ha roto un tímpano ahí, pero la verdad es que hay muchos españoles a lo largo y ancho de la piel de toro que dicen habían, hubieron... y otros horrores en otros tiempos.
En fin, ¿qué pasa con este verbo? Es impersonal, e indica cantidad de cosas, existencia. No se conjuga queridos míos.
Si lo vemos en presente: HAY
En pretérito perfecto: Ha habido (no existe han habido!!)
En indefinido: Hubo
En imperfecto: Había
etc...
Vamos a verlo con algunos ejemplos, que se ve siempre todo más claro:
En mi habitación hay una cama y dos sillas.
En mi habitación ha habido una fiesta, y ha habido mucha gente.
En mi habitación ayer hubo una fiesta, hubo mucha gente.
En mi habitación ayer había una cama y había dos sillas, pero ahora ya no están.
Como se puede observar el verbo haber no se conjuga como otros verbos. No se conjuga, es impersonal. ¡Es un verbo especial! :-D
Bài về động từ haber làm tôi nhớ lại cảm giác học ngữ pháp tiếng Tây Ban Nha: một từ quen mắt nhưng cách dùng lại thay đổi theo cấu trúc. Khi học ngoại ngữ, tôi hay để ý những tên riêng không cần dịch, giống như lúc nghe người khác bàn về game bài đổi thưởng và nhắc cwin giữa nhiều thuật ngữ lạ. Tôi mới chỉ nghe tên nên không gắn cho nó ý nghĩa nào cụ thể. Trở lại nội dung ngữ pháp, phần khiến tôi quan tâm là sự khác nhau giữa việc diễn đạt sự tồn tại và các dạng cấu tạo thì. Chỉ một động từ mà có nhiều vai trò như vậy nên nếu…
What interests me about discussing values through historical biographies is how a broad idea becomes part of an ordinary day. A person's choices can help learners discuss values in a particular historical setting. For me, that is a useful way into the broader subject of historical biography education. I can imagine different answers depending on the situation, so I would want to understand the context before drawing conclusions. How can a biography lesson connect context with questions students recognise today?
Considering developing reasoning through language and discussion, I keep coming back to the difference between knowing about an idea and putting it into practice. Explaining why an answer makes sense can reveal more than giving the answer itself. Seen this way, language and reasoning education becomes a topic to explore rather than something to sum up too quickly. A short discussion of an everyday example would make this easier for me to connect with, especially as someone still learning about the subject. Which discussion activities encourage learners to examine their own reasoning?
What draws my attention to helping students build consistent learning routines is the possibility of making an unfamiliar subject feel closer to everyday life. A regular starting point can reduce the effort needed to begin a demanding task. It gives me a more concrete starting point for thinking about consistent student routines. A short discussion of an everyday example would make this easier for me to connect with, especially as someone still learning about the subject. How can a routine stay useful as a student's workload changes?
When it comes to connecting classroom learning with Bratkowice, I would rather understand one useful detail properly than rush through a long list of ideas. A local topic can invite pupils to contribute knowledge that is not found in their textbook. This is why I would approach Bratkowice school projects with a specific question rather than a fixed expectation. I am still thinking through the details, and a small example would help me picture how this works in practice. How would you make room for those contributions while keeping the project focused?